I'm currently working on a paper discusses the resulting choices made by the Canadian Government to handle the Covid-19 pandemic for all Canadians. This includes the lack of accurate information provided by the professionals in the field of science and health for which the Canadian government has been following. As a result, using the “emergency measures” policies put in place, most actions of the government have now been placed into laws that must be followed by all Canadians. Now, well into the second year of the pandemic, the “scientific data” begins to show many results that question whether the procedures we took were the right ones.
During my research I found the 2019 Flu deaths for both Canada and the USA. The CDC estimates that the burden of illness during the 2018–2019 season included an estimated 35.5 million people getting sick with influenza, 16.5 million people going to a health care provider for their illness, 490,600 hospitalizations, and 34,200 deaths from influenza.
The population of the USA in 2019 was 328.2 million people. Quick math determines that this works out to 9596 deaths per year or 26.2 deaths per day. Worldometers shows the USA at 300 deaths per day for the last 2 days and knowing that my quick research only deals with the flu/pneumonia and the USA has privatized health insurance/HMO's, these numbers are likely very similar.
Doing the math on this for Canada, which had a population of 37.59 million people, we can determine the total amount of deaths by the total population and dividing it by 100,000 which is 375.9 and then multiply that figure by 18 deaths (the amount per 100,000 people), for a total of 6766.2 people per year. We can then determine the daily death rate by dividing this figure by 365 days. We now know that 18.53 people die from the flu/pneumonia in Canada each day.
Currently the death rates based from Worldometer.info for Canada shows 10 deaths 2 days ago and 5 deaths yesterday.
Since flu deaths have not been recorded since Covid started it would seem this Covid-19 thing could be nothing more than a bad strain of the seasonal flu. With news stories reporting all these new "strains" including the "super contagious Delta Variant". I'm not making light of this fact through sounding facetious either. The fact that in 2019 when Canada noted a spike in flu deaths, wouldn't it seem natural that the next year it might even be that much worse? More truth to this theory becomes more apparent as the days, weeks and now months of "Vaccines" meant to save all of humanity continues to have questions of the length of efficacy, which could not be given because there were no previous trials. As it has now been about 8 months since the first vaccines, we are witnessing more and more 'breakthrough cases' which are those getting tested after being fully vaccinated, with the Covid-19 infection. This would seem as though the efficacy is in fact beginning to break down and thus, the need for a booster, either every 6 months to a year, as "prescribed" by Pfizer and the others, noting the negative publicity Johnson & Johnson gets, is it because there's is "one and done"? Where is the $$ in that? This is always a good way to do any type of research.. follow the money trail!
Questions like "when will it become FDA approved (Health Canada)"? This one question being answered would likely see those that are holding out, are NOT anti-vaxxers and were simply waiting until it was approved. But if we follow the money logic here, we can quickly determine that once it becomes approved, the emergency use is dropped and someone needs to take responsibility for any deaths that end up becoming directly as a result of the administration of this "approved" vaccine.
If you put your science cap on, you can also determine pretty quickly that: The idea of having 100 % of the entire human species vaccinated by something that is still classified as "emergency authorization" use from any true scientist would quickly determine this to be a very bad idea. With any valid experiment/study there must be a valid test group which means half get a placebo and the other half get the test material. This would mean that if your test group was 1000 people, that there would be 500 people left on the planet if something were to happen to those that had administered the vaccination. The study never ends until approval has been provided and even then the data continues to be analyzed as long as it is used. This should also mean those that were given a placebo should NEVER receive the vaccine, yet from the sounds of it they were given their own choice, once they were released from the study??
If anything you have just read provides you with some of your own questions, I might suggest listing to the No Agenda Show. This podcast represents ground zero of all things Covid related. For that matter, anything the news media continues to try to push on those that will listen is de-constructed by both Adam and John. When you listen, many people that hate what they hear and call these two conspiracy theorists aren't getting the big picture here... they are de-constructing what you are hearing from all channels of the main stream media so if there is something you really hate to hear, that is likely the sound of your own amygdala shrinking. If you aren't sure and can't believe it then give it a second and third listen. The podcast is live on Thursdays and Sundays and typically runs around 3 hours per episode, perfect for those on any sort of commute. It truly is the best podcast in the Universe!
Posts
