As an owner of the DJI Phantom 2 vision, I take serious offense to the negative press "drones" continue to get. First of all, unless the device does have a camera that makes it a FPV (first person view) device, then it can't be considered a drone. It is nothing more than a remote controlled hobby aircraft. Secondly, why does the DJI Phantom picture always show up in the headline of the news story. In this case, they do provide a disclaimer stating "a
drone similar to this phantom model, but with a camera mounted" well yeah, if it was 'peeping' then it must have had a camera--so why not at least use a picture of the model of drone that was 'allegedly' peeping? Why not--because these reporters are too damn lazy to do any real research to the story. This is one more reason why the No Agenda Show is where everyone should be getting their REAL NEWS!
Creepy, peeping drone spotted in downtown Vancouver (with video)